August 09, 2020, 12:38:08 PM

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
General Discussion / Re: MW arena update 2020
« Last post by exid on July 23, 2020, 02:40:00 PM »
They finally decided to make an errata and continue to develop the first version?
12
General Discussion / Re: MW arena update 2020
« Last post by farkas1 on July 23, 2020, 10:31:27 AM »
Yep lots has happened. Arcane duels are working with Arcane Wonders for last errata for a few cards and rules.  As well as balancing and release of all unreleased promos.  And a mini expansion for Arena Monk and Elementalist.   Playtesting all errata and cards currently on OCTGN. 
13
General Discussion / Re: MW arena update 2020
« Last post by exid on July 23, 2020, 10:18:46 AM »
A few more words...

It would be sad to let my cards in there boxes, in the basement... but it would be a lot sadder to be bound to them when creating a new version!


3 points I would reproach to MW and put on the table for a new version:
(and, just to be clear, when I write MW I mean arena! I bought academy for a few useful cards in the arena but never played it)

1) to many conditions.
I like an aggravated wound but don't need burn, poisoned, rot, etc.
I like an incapacitated creature but don't need slam, daze, stun, etc.
etc.

2) spellbind makes the game repetitive.
I prefer to see many spells and strategies during my games.

3) AW never errated...
I like to get a well thought game when I buy it, but when a problem appears it must be fixed!
14
General Discussion / Re: MW arena update 2020
« Last post by exid on July 23, 2020, 09:33:28 AM »
wow... I came back just to see if somebody's still here... WOW! somebody and some news!

I don't know where it leads, but I didn't play MW for a few years and didn't find replacement.
If AW creates something as rich as it was, as long as it was, as complex as it was, I'm looking forward to play it.
15
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by Karadox on July 22, 2020, 01:35:30 PM »
I would add the 4th variant of the angel to one of the others. 

If your Mage is trained Holy, this creature gains the angel subtype and the Aegis 2 trait.
If your Mage is trained Dark, this creature gains the Demon subtype Vampiric trait.

It makes sense when the angel has lost his sanctity, that he losses his divine protection.

I think this variant should be the core of the card

+ Objects in this zone do not remove burns during upkeep.

I would merge both versions of the angel into one.

16
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by shapeshifter on July 22, 2020, 12:47:55 PM »
I voted for both the Vigilant traited Soldier. It one of my fav traits in the game.
I voted for the burns dont fall off in upkeep. I dont like additional mana requirements on my 18 mana creatures.
17
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by Coshade on July 17, 2020, 11:27:24 AM »
I'll have to manually add it up later, thanks Farkas!
18
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by farkas1 on July 17, 2020, 10:21:29 AM »
Also not sure but I voted Iím pretty sure I voted for number 2 and 4 for the knight yet it marked me for 1 and 4.  Iím not sure if it was a glitch or a user error on my part.
19
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by farkas1 on July 17, 2020, 10:18:36 AM »
Vote for 4 for the knight.  Or 2 both have great interaction with lvl1 creatures! 
20
General Discussion / Re: Create a Card - Final Vote!
« Last post by Knabbmaster on July 16, 2020, 04:03:58 PM »
For card 1 option 2 (the angel who opens gate to hell) I feel like you should probably add something like:
''gate to hell' can only be opened by this effect.'
At the end of the card so that it thematically makes sense for a holy mage to play her as a counter. She would essentially be an angel tasked with keeping the gate shut at all times with a tendency for betrayal.
(not that anyone was begging for a counter to gate to hell but at least  it would make the 'or holy' feel more natural).

Also I wish the flavor text would read something like: "See? I AM good... at WINNING!"

Edit: I reffered to card 1 option 1 (though that was rather obvious).

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10